A reader recently emailed me in response to my Kill Pontiac post, and pointed out that killing a whole nameplate would be devastating to the GM dealers, and in turn devastating to GM. That is true.
There is just too much auto capacity on the market. With Hyundai/Kia gaining, Chrysler gaining, BMW gaining, Toyota gaining, there has to be some big losers. And China is on the horizon. Unfortunately for us Detroiters, the market share has to come out of GM and Ford.
The goal for GM and Ford is not "how do we win back the market". The boat has sailed, Americans are buying foreign carmaker's products with abandon. The goal is "how do we stay profitable, and retain the market share we have now". The only way to do this is to figure out how to make money as a smaller company than you were 10 years ago. The way to do this is not to pile cash on the hood of sub-par products, you'll just high-volume yourself to death. GM needs to shrink. It will be painful and destructive. The company is getting rid of 2000 salaried heads, and it will need to close plants as well.
GM will lose dealers if they kill Pontiac. But GM will also lose dealers in some areas if its market share keeps dropping--they will just starve to death.
6 comments:
As you point out in your Kill Pontiac post, GM is behind in the tech race but will killing Pontiac do anything? I doubt it. GM had an engine that could more than compete with the Honda lump you lovingly gush about in that post. It was the 3.5 litre DOHC Olds that was 75% of a Northstar.
GM shuts down Olds, but does not keep anything good from it. Not only did GM not find room for some of the only technolgy it had that was up to import levels, it also killed off the cars that could have competed in terms of style and content. GM could have repaced say, the Bonneville and Lesabre with variants of the more advanced Aurora, or at least salvaged bits from it's drivetrain and interior, but chose not to due to cost. The direction Olds was going could have saved more of GM even if they just distributed some of the good bits at it's demise. But no, GM continued with pushrods, fluffy seats, toy instruments, and dashes that look like they are made along side cheap plastic beer coolers.
If GM kills Pontiac, don't kid yoursef, all the good bits will be thown out too. Some beancouter will come up for a reason why, and that will be it.
Buick has way too much stigma attached to it to do GM any good. If GM is going to get anywhere with this sort of suggestion it would be to roll the divisions into one, but maintain product differntiation through almost a trim-level option. This would be transparent to the public, but derive all sorts of economies at the corporate level.
GM could NEVER roll all it's divisions into one. Dealers have paid to get franchises. Someone with a standalone Chevy dealership couldn't suddenly start selling the exact same products as a Pontiac-GMC dealer across the street, who both sell the exact same products the luxury Cadillac dealer down the street. The legal and monetary ramifications of this would far from "transparent."
I too mourn the end of the "shortstar" engine.
You misunderstand me. Rolling them together may have larger dealer issues, but it's all a matter of execution. All Buick dealers now are also pontiac dealers from the standpoint of GM and vice versa, but can only order their unique product codes. Head office duplication is elimiated, Two marques are seen by the public, and dealers. Better than killing one of them off. What are the dealers gona sell then?
Sure GM has to shrink, but ti's a questions of demographics as to which division is killed. If the market share is in youth, Pontiac may be able to grab some of the kids by offering a sportier alternative to Chevy. Remember the GTO kicked off the muscle car craze. Whereas Buick is seen as an old man's car. And if the market swings that way, retirees in Florida will be charting a course with Roadmasters again.
I think it will call come down to the demos. Find the biggest chunk and market towards them. As for the technology, the general has done this before. Some technology stays on forever, i.e. the small block and new tech comes late to the party as in the ecotec.
It's not just about killing a brand, they also have way too many models: 89.
That's right, 89 models to achieve 24.7% market share. Toyota has 26 models and 12.6% share. They need to cut at least half of the vehicles they currently offer in order to spend as much on engineering and advertising on a per-vehicle basis as Toyota does.
Post a Comment